For creators who suspect they're hidden
See who your posts actually reach.
Followers volunteer to check their own feeds, so you see exactly where your delivery goes dark, and get evidence for your appeal.
"I posted about illegal mining poisoning our river. Views fell from 40,000 to 3,000 overnight. The platform says nothing is wrong."
Dami Asante, creator, AccraStep 1 of 2: build a panel
Ask followers to help
Step 2 of 2: platforms
Platform names are fictional for this demo.
30 days of checks before 2 October set what "normal" looks like for you: 61% of volunteers saw a new Clipstream post within 24 hours (range 52 to 68%).
Volunteer side: Kwabena in Kumasi
The extension, as a volunteer sees it
Last check 09:12. Next in about 3 hours, at a random time.
What it checks
Only whether Dami's posts appear when you open your feed, and in search for her name. It scrolls 50 items, notes yes or no and the position, and stops.
What it never reads
Your messages, other people's posts, who you follow, your browsing, your account name.
Exactly what it sends
Checking Part 3
Asking 214 feeds
17% of volunteers saw it, against your usual 61%. Similar creators look normal tonight. Start an evidence report?
Reach Check sent this on its own, after 6 hours of checks. It won't call it throttling until the pattern holds.
While you were away
Wed 18:00 to Fri 01:00
Delivery
Who actually saw Dami's posts
Share of volunteers who saw each day's post
Clipstream feed delivery
Recovery after the appeal
Evidence report
Clipstream, 2 to 9 October
NOT PROOF
Search: 0 of 180 searches for "Dami Asante river" found the posts. Her non-river post on 6 Oct reached 58%. Picwall and Chirp were normal (63% and 71%).
- 214 opted-in followers in 9 countries, logged in as themselves.
- Each checks at 3 random times within 24 hours of a post: opens the feed, scrolls 50 items, and searches 2 fixed phrases.
- Baseline: 30 days, 41 posts. Comparison: 38 creators of similar size and region using the same method.
- Checks from broken sessions or ad blockers are removed (212 removed, listed in the appendix).
- Volunteers are fans who opted in, not a random sample of followers.
- Feeds change for many reasons: timing, topic interest, platform-wide tests.
- We can see that delivery dropped, not why.
- Around 70 checks per post per day: the range is roughly plus or minus 9 points.
Appeal draft
Make reach visible.
- Year 1: 10,000 creators with consenting panels, starting with journalists and activists who post on sensitive topics.
- Year 2: an open, anonymised index of delivery by topic and country that researchers and press can cite.
- Year 3: platforms answer appeals with a specific reason because the evidence is standard, and quiet suppression stops being invisible.
Panel
214 people checking for Dami
Where they are
Panel health
Thank your volunteers
A monthly note with what their checks achieved. No rewards, so nobody is paid to say "not seen".
Control
Your evidence, your call
Reach Check measures and drafts. It never posts, submits or contacts a platform on your behalf, and volunteers' data never leaves as individual rows.
About 640 checks per post. More checks narrow the range but use more of volunteers' battery and data.